Do “Processor” and “Controller” Invoke 35 U.S.C. § 112(f)? Ensuring structural support for arguably means plus function limitations

By Ambar Nayate, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Stating the Obvious: Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

By Sarah Myhrom EisenmanShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Revisions to Patent Examination Guidelines in China

By Al W. VredeveldShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Claim Drafting to Support Latent Infringement

By Carl G. PetersonShumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Federal Circuit Trading on Recent Precedent to Find Graphical User Interface Claim Patent-Eligible

By Paul McAdams, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Federal Circuit Addresses Indefiniteness of Disclosed Algorithms in Means-Plus-Function Claims

By Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Satisfying Written Description With Examples


Ambar P. Nayate, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

New USPTO P3 Program Now Available for After-final Prosecution

USPTO Unveils New After-Final, Pre-Appeal Pilot Program

Zachary S. Pratt, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More

Alice Step 2 Eligibility Refined by Federal Circuit: Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC

By Albert W. Vredeveld, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Patentees now have another valuable Federal Circuit decision to use to counter allegations that their claims are directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Read More

USPTO Memo to Patent Examining Corp Provides Guidance Regarding Enfish and TLI

By Michelle A. Bresler, Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.

Read More